I watched with some amusement the “No Labels” republicans on Meet the Press paired with the other side. Joe as usual made some good points, but his assertion that Rush Limbaugh is enraged with the group is nonsense. There is no nice way to say it so I’ll just say it: He’s laughing at you because he correctly thinks this no label thing is a farce.
George Will nails it:
adopting a political label should be an act of civic candor. When people label themselves conservatives or liberals we can reasonably surmise where they stand concerning important matters, such as Hudson’s ruling. The label “conservative” conveys much useful information about people who adopt it. So does the label “liberal,” which is why most liberals have abandoned it, preferring “progressive,” until they discredit it, too.
And Glenn Reynolds (guest Jan 15th btw) dots the I and Crosses the T (in the navel sense):
Why are they against labels? Because if they were labeled accurately, no one would listen to them . . . .
That ones gotta leave a mark, particularly from the blogfather but hey if no labels can prove me wrong more power to them!