One more thing about Sarah Palin and why she makes establishment folks uncomfortable

Posted: December 16, 2010 in catholic, tea parties
Tags: , , , , , ,

In addition to the other problems that the establishment has with Sarah Palin. She also calls out their religious “personally believes” nonsense. It so rattled Kathleen Kennedy Townsend As Patrick O’Hannigan reports, had to respond:

Washington Post editors gave Townsend 1,500 words to defend her uncle’s attempt to compartmentalize his faith, but the “coulda been a contender” lament that they got for their trouble only exposed Townsend as another palooka in a family full of them.

Townsend asserts that she gave America by Heart a careful reading, from which she came away sure that Palin supports an unconstitutional religious test for public office. Inconveniently, we have to take Townsend’s word for that, because Palin actually says no such thing: the closest she gets is to express disappointment at John F. Kennedy’s failure to reconcile his “private faith and public role,” and his unwillingness to tell fellow countrymen “how his faith had enriched him.”

Well who knows faith better, a non-Catholic like Palin or a member of as far as the media is concerning the Catholic family of America? Let’s ask archbishop Chaput:

Speaking this past spring at Houston Baptist University, Archbishop Chaput noted that “Real Christian faith is always personal, but it’s never private.” That was one of the things about which John F. Kennedy was mistaken. Moreover, said Chaput, Kennedy’s remarks in Houston “profoundly undermined the place not just of Catholics, but of all religious believers, in America’s public life and political conversation.” And “Today, half a century later, we’re paying for the damage.”

In other words, Sarah Palin’s criticism of the Kennedy approach to faith accords substantially with criticisms offered by another Christian of unquestioned acumen. Not only that, but Chaput came loaded for bear, quoting another scholar to buttress the point that John F. Kennedy “secularized the American presidency in order to win it.”

But what does he know? He’s only an Archbishop.

That’s why they fear Palin she and the tea parties that support her, they threaten their entire way of life and force them to face realities beyond it.

Update: Cleaned up the first sentence and added quotes. Let me clarify what “Personally Believes” stuff means. It is when a pols says he “personally believes” something but votes a different way due to a separation between their religious belief and their public life. This is nonsense since we are the sum of our beliefs and if we are willing to turn them off like a light switch then we are hollow.

Comments
  1. John says:

    Sarah Palin recognizes, as did many of our founding fathers, that the moral foundation Judeo/Christian beliefs bring are a key component in making the constitution work. It doesn’t take a genius to know this. Without that moral compass, the constitution is doomed to failure, as we are witnessing currently. Humans are very flawed, just look at the Kennedys for example, but we must strive to be something more. Leftists believe that moral compass must be mandated by Govt. In a sense, Govt. becomes God. Sarah Palin believes a tyrannical govt isn’t the answer, but a responsible moral people looking for answers in something greater than govt.

    For me, even if God is taken out of the Bible, it’s one heck of a text on what works and what doesn’t, in regard to how people should treat each other, and how to live.

    just an opinion. hehe

  2. […] Da Techguy: “In addition to the other problems that the establishment has with Sarah Palin. She also calls out their religious ‘personally believes’ nonsense… It is when a pol says he ‘personally believes’ something but votes a different way…” […]