The Globe discovers that Massachusetts has shot itself in the foot…AGAIN

Posted: November 12, 2010 in congress, economy, elections, opinion/news, politics
Tags: , , , , , , ,

The Boston Globe reports that things are looking grim for Massachusetts:

Massachusetts could lose more than $200 million in funding this year — and quite possibly similar amounts each year for the foreseeable future — as the incoming Republican congressional leadership and President Obama take aim at earmarked spending projects.

At risk are a host of projects across Massachusetts. The Paul Revere House in Boston’s North End could lose $400,000 in funds for a crucial renovation project. The University of Massachusetts Amherst could see $2 million intended for a science building slip away. And a new Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate could lose $10 million — providing an unintended case study in the politics of federal spending.

Hang on a second didn’t we just hear all during the last election how much our delegation was able to “bring home the bacon” so to speak?

Massachusetts Democrats have long boasted of their ability to win hundreds of millions of dollars in earmarked funds for such projects. But speaker-in-waiting John Boehner, the Ohio Republican, has said earmarks must end,

Oh republicans are in charge in the House now where all spending much come from. Well I’m sure the Massachusetts members of the new House Majority will use what pull they have to help protect the state.

What that you say? While practically the entire country joined the big red wave Massachusetts once again elected only democrats? We don’t have any committee chairmen anymore or even a single member in the majority to try to help protect the state? Funny how the globe finds bad news now that the election is over.

Let’s be blunt. For months we have known the democratic majority in the house was doomed and as the president’s popularity continues to drop, 2012 is looking just as dark for Democrats.

Yet Massachusetts voters (perhaps with some help) choose to return Barney (Fannie/Freddie are fine) Frank and John (it was only 7 million my wife helped hide from Taxes) Tierney and the entire Massachusetts delegation. We knew about these things and voted them back in.

In a republic we always get the government we deserve. You wanted a delegation from the left. You’ve got it. As I said the day after the election:

…it will be the shock when you discover that all these democrats that you returned to congress are now in the minority and all of those tax dollars taken from you that they returned in lump sums at .82 cents on the dollar will not be coming back since they don’t have the clout to gain them and the republican house where all spending must originate is unlikely to approve them. If you had sent even a single republican to the house at least in one district there would be clout, but nope, no can do. You will miss that .82 cents on the dollar, but don’t worry the feds will meet you halfway. They will still take that dollar it was part of.

I don’t want to hear a single complaint from anyone on the left in the state over this.

And as for everyone else, you get another chance in two years. Don’t blow it.

Comments
  1. mcoville says:

    The worst part is that they still do not see the truth that it is not the responsibility of the federal government to fund those projects. I don’t care what party has the majority and what party the reps are in, it is not the responsibility of the federal government to tax the people of other states to pay for projects within another.

    If all of these kind of projects where defunded federally we could allow the states to raise their taxes by lowering the national tax. Then the states could fund their own projects with the money from those that live in that state.

  2. […] The Globe discovers that Massachusetts has shot itself in the foot…AGAIN […]

  3. CR says:

    The Paul Revere House … $400,000
    The University of Massachusetts Amherst … $2 million intended for a science building.
    Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate … $10 million

    Interesting to note where the porking priorities are in the Federal Government.

  4. John Fast says:

    Personally, if blue states can’t get any earmarks, grants, or other discretionary spending any more, I would consider it to be a feature rather than a bug.

  5. dahospitalityguy says:

    Try cutting 1/2 the miltary budget 1st thats where the real savings occurs.